On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 06:17:43PM -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > On Wednesday, Dec 31, 2003, at 15:52 US/Central, Tommi Virtanen wrote: > >I think devfs names are accepted as root= arguments, so that's a bit of > >a loss.. with udev, your /dev and your root= are equal only if you > >follow the standard naming. > > > >For root=, I can see how early userspace can move that to userspace. > >But what about swsuspend? > > > >Are there any more kernel options taking file names? I think now would > >be a good time to stop adding more of them :) > > "console=" takes driver-supplied names which usually happen to match > /dev node names. For example, drivers/serial/8250.c names itself > "ttyS", so "console=ttyS0" will end up going to that driver, regardless > of the state of /dev. These are just string matches that the different console drivers use. They have nothing to do with an actual /dev node. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordTommi Virtanen
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordHollis Blanchard
- Prev by Date: Re: removable media revalidation - udev vs. devfs or static /dev
- Next by Date: Re: udev and devfs - The final word
- Previous by thread: Re: udev and devfs - The final word
- Next by thread: Re: udev and devfs - The final word
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]