On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 12:42:41PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: Hi Linus - A happy 2004 ! > Note that one reason I didn't much like the 64-bit versions is that not > only are they bigger, they also encourage insanity. Ie you'd find SCSI > people who want to try to encode device/controller/bus/target/lun info > into the device number. Weak. "We don't want this power that has good uses because it also can be used stupidly." That is not Unix-style. > We should resist any effort that makes the numbers "mean" something. They > are random cookies. Not "unique identifiers", and not "addresses". Random cookies? I prefer "arbitrary" over "random". The value plays no role at all, but it must be unique, preferably stable across reboots. Andries - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordLinus Torvalds
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordAndries Brouwer
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordRob Love
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordRob Landley
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordRob Love
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordAndries Brouwer
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordRob Love
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordLinus Torvalds
- Prev by Date: Re: udev - please help me to understand
- Next by Date: Re: Strange IDE performance change in 2.6.1-rc1 (again)
- Previous by thread: Re: udev and devfs - The final word
- Next by thread: Re: udev and devfs - The final word
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]