caszonyi _at_ rdslink.ro wrote: > > see atached file > mplayer: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x21 > Call Trace: > [<c013a3fc>] __alloc_pages+0x30c/0x350 > [<c013a45f>] __get_free_pages+0x1f/0x50 > [<c036fd5d>] sound_alloc_dmap+0x9d/0x1a0 > [<c0377ec0>] ad_mute+0x20/0x40 > [<c0370116>] open_dmap+0x26/0x100 > [<c0370554>] DMAbuf_open+0x174/0x1a0 > [<c036e0c2>] audio_open+0xc2/0x250 > [<c036d2e4>] sound_open+0xf4/0x120 > [<c036c5b5>] soundcore_open+0x1e5/0x330 > [<c036c3d0>] soundcore_open+0x0/0x330 > [<c015c3e8>] chrdev_open+0xe8/0x210 > [<c0161fdc>] open_namei+0xac/0x3f0 > [<c015c300>] chrdev_open+0x0/0x210 > [<c0152425>] dentry_open+0x145/0x210 > [<c01522d8>] filp_open+0x68/0x70 > [<c015276b>] sys_open+0x5b/0x90 > [<c0109367>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb > > Sound error: Couldn't allocate DMA buffer > esd: page allocation failure. order:4, mode:0x21 > Call Trace: > [<c013a3fc>] __alloc_pages+0x30c/0x350 > [<c013a45f>] __get_free_pages+0x1f/0x50 > [<c036fd5d>] sound_alloc_dmap+0x9d/0x1a0 > [<c0377ec0>] ad_mute+0x20/0x40 > [<c0370116>] open_dmap+0x26/0x100 > [<c0370554>] DMAbuf_open+0x174/0x1a0 > [<c036e0c2>] audio_open+0xc2/0x250 > [<c036d2e4>] sound_open+0xf4/0x120 > [<c036c5b5>] soundcore_open+0x1e5/0x330 > [<c036c3d0>] soundcore_open+0x0/0x330 > [<c015c3e8>] chrdev_open+0xe8/0x210 > [<c0161fdc>] open_namei+0xac/0x3f0 > [<c015c300>] chrdev_open+0x0/0x210 > [<c0152425>] dentry_open+0x145/0x210 > [<c01522d8>] filp_open+0x68/0x70 > [<c015276b>] sys_open+0x5b/0x90 > [<c0109367>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb sound_alloc_dmap() is trying to perform a 4-order GFP_ATOMIC allocation. There is just nothing the MM system can do about that - it is a basic design problem in that part of the OSS sound system. I'm not sure what to suggest - development and maintenance of OSS seems to have come to a stop. Can you use ALSA instead? If not, increasing /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes by quite a lot will probably decrease the frequency at which this occurs. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: Memory management problem with 2.6.0caszonyi
- Re: Memory management problem with 2.6.0Andrew Morton
- Re: Memory management problem with 2.6.0caszonyi
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.0-rc1-mm1
- Next by Date: Re: UNICODE ioctls on background console
- Previous by thread: Re: Memory management problem with 2.6.0
- Next by thread: How to avoid 'lost interrupt' messages post-resume?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]