On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 09:11:01PM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote: > nVidia's _video_ drivers are mostly proprietary code that is not > specific to Linux. They provide a GPL wrapper or shim that, apparently > in the view of their lawyers, insulates their proprietary code from GPL > license terms. > > Perhaps their network software is done the same way? It's a fair argument that nVidia has significant IP in their video drivers... I understand that's where they get a fair amount of their speed. For a network driver, nVidia will have a really tough time convincing me there is useful IP in their NIC driver, or the NIC itself :) There are much more advanced NICs out there (with public docs, no less)... Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups: References:
- Prev by Date: [RFC][PATCH] Move bv_offset/bv_len update after bio_endio in __end_that_request_first
- Next by Date: Re: [Dri-devel] 2.6 kernel change in nopage
- Previous by thread: Re: Compatibility of Nvidia NVNET driver license with GPL
- Next by thread: Re: Compatibility of Nvidia NVNET driver license with GPL
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]