Michael Clark wrote: > Yes I see what you mean after having a look. Would make sense to convert > this over to use only LSM hooks (which it appears to use already) if that > was possible - or maybe could be done using a VFS proxy filesystem that > monitors/relays calls to an underlying fs. I don't think using LSM hooks for this is a good idea. While it makes the changes less invasive, it forces you to enable LSM just to get file change modifications. -- Javier Fernandez-Ivern - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: File change notificationJavier Fernandez-Ivern
- Re: File change notificationR$B|d(Biger Klaehn
- Re: File change notificationMichael Clark
- Re: File change notificationDave Jones
- Re: File change notificationMichael Clark
- Prev by Date: Happy New Year
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pci_set_dac helper
- Previous by thread: Re: File change notification
- Next by thread: Re: File change notification
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]