Rob Love wrote: >>Let me try to rephrase Nathan's question more explicitly. >> >>If user policy decides all naming, how does the kernel parse e.g. >>root=/dev/foo arguments? Or the swap partition to use for swsuspend? > Oh. That has always been a hack, ala name_to_dev_t(). > > We will have to continue doing that hack so long as those users are in > the kernel proper (and not early user-space, for example). I think devfs names are accepted as root= arguments, so that's a bit of a loss.. with udev, your /dev and your root= are equal only if you follow the standard naming. For root=, I can see how early userspace can move that to userspace. But what about swsuspend? Are there any more kernel options taking file names? I think now would be a good time to stop adding more of them :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordHollis Blanchard
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordGreg KH
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordRob Love
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordNathan Conrad
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordRob Love
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordTommi Virtanen
- Re: udev and devfs - The final wordRob Love
- Prev by Date: Re: udev and devfs - The final word
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kthread_create
- Previous by thread: Re: udev and devfs - The final word
- Next by thread: Re: udev and devfs - The final word
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]