Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?

[Pavel Machek <pavel _at_ xxxxxx>]

Hi!

> >   - Flaws in error recovery paths in certain situations
> >   - Lots of random oopses on boot/remove that were apparently
> >     introduced by the kobject/sysfs people and need chasing
> >     down. (There are some non sysfs ones mostly fixed)
> 
> I guess the kobject/sysfs stuff could be ripped out if it doesn't
> work - it is probably not a "must have" feature.

sysfs is  needed to properly flush caches on powerdown and for
S3/S4 suspend/resume to work.
								Pavel
-- 
Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net.
What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/