On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Alistair Strachan wrote:
I'm still not sure if I agree with this change... Couldn't be possible
that even if one __copy_from_user() fails the next one could succeed?
Is it really necessary to return at the first error?
Rui
> Hi,
>
> This diff applies over the top of Rui's diff to provide the
> __copy_{to,from}_user fixes present in -dj. The merging of both these diffs
> would remove all the remaining important emu10k1 changes from -dj.
>
> Cheers,
> Alistair Strachan.
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: [PATCH] emu10k1 forward port (2.4.20 to 2.5.56)Alistair Strachan
- Prev by Date: Curso GIS y Teledeteccion
- Next by Date: Re: VIA C3 and random SIGTRAP or segfault
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] emu10k1 forward port (2.4.20 to 2.5.56)
- Next by thread: [2.5 patch] go to drivers/ide/pci/ even for !CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEPCI
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]