Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?

[John Levon <levon _at_ xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:14:52AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:

> >But still requiring up-apic, or smp with apic, right?
> 
> nmi_watchdog=2 - uses performance counters, not apic.

which requires a local APIC to set up NMI delivery mode like Jens said

regards
john

-- 
Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person,
the thread is over.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/