On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:48:31 +0100, Jens Axboe <axboe _at_ suse.de> wrote: >On Mon, Jan 13 2003, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: >> It uses NMI's to break into the debugger, so it would also work with >> interrupts disabled and spinning on a lock, the same is also true for >> kgdb. > >But still requiring up-apic, or smp with apic, right? nmi_watchdog=2 - uses performance counters, not apic. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?John Levon
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Jens Axboe
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files
- Previous by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]