> I ran into a couple places where CONFIG_X86_NUMA is still there (replaced > now with CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ), which disables following defines: Yeah, I saw those the other day. Should probably be replaced with CONFIG_NUMA ... I'll tweak them once I get the last dribbles of Summit pushed out to Linus. Thanks, M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanupProtasevich, Natalie
- Prev by Date: RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup
- Next by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup
- Next by thread: RE: [PATCH] (0/7) Finish moving NUMA-Q into subarch, cleanup
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]