On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 04:13:19PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > > Linus, please apply if you agree. > > > > Tridge reported getting burned by gcc 3.2 compiled (Debian) XFree > > modules not working on his gcc 2.95-compiled kernel. Interestingly, > > (as Tridge points out) modversions probably would not have caught the > > change in spinlock size, since the ioctl takes a void*, not a > > structure pointer... > > > D: and compiler version (spinlocks change size on UP with gcc major, > > D: at least). > > Why does this happen? It doesn't look like it should, but I only > skimmed the headers checking... I suppose it's due to the #if (__GNUC__ > 2) [...] in include/linux/spinlock.h, i.e. it's not at all gcc's fault. --Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: [PATCH] Check compiler version, SMP and PREEMPT.Daniel Jacobowitz
- Prev by Date: Re: why the new config process is a *big* step backwards
- Next by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Check compiler version, SMP and PREEMPT.
- Next by thread: 2.5.56, modules, and RedHat Psyche
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]