On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 02:34:54PM -0500, Rob Wilkens wrote: > I'm REALLY opposed to the use of the word "goto" in any code where it's > not needed. OF course, I'm a linux kernel newbie, so I'm in no position > to comment Someone want to add this one to the lkml faq (does anyone actually read that these days?) or maybe http://www.kernelnewbies.org/faq/ Wow, one week later, and this would tie in with the fourth anniversary of someone else[2] making an ass of himself on this issue[1] Dave [1] http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/9901.2/0939.html [2] Complete with quaint 'cool' l33t handle. How 90s! *bows head in shame* -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Andrew Walrond
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Oliver Neukum
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Bruce Harada
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Linus Torvalds
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Rob Wilkens
- Prev by Date: Re: some curiosities on the filesystems layout in kernel config
- Next by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Previous by thread: Re: gotos in kernel [Was: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?]
- Next by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]