Linus Torvalds <torvalds _at_ transmeta.com> said: > On 12 Jan 2003, Robert Love wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 15:22, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > No, you've been brainwashed by CS people who thought that Niklaus > > > Wirth actually knew what he was talking about. He didn't. He > > > doesn't have a frigging clue. > > > > I thought Edsger Dijkstra coined the "gotos are evil" bit in his > > structured programming push? > Yeah, he did, but he's dead, and we shouldn't talk ill of the dead. So > these days I can only rant about Niklaus Wirth, who took the "structured > programming" thing and enforced it in his languages (Pascal and Modula-2), > and thus forced his evil on untold generations of poor CS students who had > to learn langauges that weren't actually useful for real work. You did not live through the horror that was FORTRAN IV, I learned programming in it (no structure except DO, a primitive for). Sure, Pascal strictures are overkill, but in a sense they were needed to implant a bit of structure into the mess that usually came before. > (Yeah, yeah, most _practical_ versions of Pascal ended up having all the > stuff necessary to break structure, but as you may be able to tell, I was > one of the unwashed masses who had to write in "standard Pascal" in my > youth. I'm scarred for life). And you do break structure only when necessary, so the dosis of Pascal did you some good after all ;-) -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Linus Torvalds
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.5.56-mm1
- Next by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Previous by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]