<quote who="Oliver Neukum"> > Am Montag, 13. Januar 2003 00:05 schrieb Emiliano Gabrielli: >> <quote who="Rob Wilkens"> >> >> > On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:43, Oliver Neukum wrote: >> >> It's code that causes added hardship for anybody checking the locking. >> > >> > I can certainly see where it would seem "easier" to match "one lock" to "one >> unlock" if your troubleshooting a locking issue. >> > >> > "easier" is the motivation behind using goto.. Laziness.. that's all it is. >> >> In italy we say "Non c'peggior sordo di chi non vuole sentire" > > There's no worse fate than that of those who don't want to listen? (My Italian is > bad.) It is better than my english :-)) > >> Till to this point the thread was useful to beginners becouse of a lot of smarty >> coders explained a point that everyone has heard but that rarely knows at deep... >> >> but now Let's ignore him ! He is not a beginner he is a lamer! > > Very well. What could be said has been said. But please don't insult him. Time spent > explaining is usually well spent. Perhaps somebody learned. > I agree .. my apologises .. I use currently the word "lamer" in IRC, but I don't really know the true translation.. if it is an insult .. plz adcept my apologises > OK, maybe I have a soft spot. > :-) > Regards > Oliver -- Emiliano Gabrielli dip. di Fisica 2ー Universitdi Roma "Tor Vergata" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Linus Torvalds
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Rob Wilkens
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Emiliano Gabrielli
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Oliver Neukum
- Prev by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by Date: Kernel oops in 2.4.21-pre3-ac2
- Previous by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]