On Saturday 11 January 2003 15:43, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Agreed, but honestly just this explanation would make it easier to > understand! I'm not sure you have the "balance of nodes" trigger defined > quite right, but I'm assuming if this gets implemented as described that > some long term umbalance detector mechanism will be run occasionally. Yes, the current plan is to extend the miniature NUMA scheduler by a inter-node balancer which is called less frequently. Regards, Erich - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: [Lse-tech] Minature NUMA schedulerBill Davidsen
- Prev by Date: Re: Honest does not pay here ...
- Next by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Previous by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] Minature NUMA scheduler
- Next by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] Minature NUMA scheduler
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]