<quote who="Rob Wilkens"> > On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:43, Oliver Neukum wrote: >> It's code that causes added hardship for anybody checking the locking. > > I can certainly see where it would seem "easier" to match "one lock" to "one unlock" > if your troubleshooting a locking issue. > > "easier" is the motivation behind using goto.. Laziness.. that's all it is. In italy we say "Non c'peggior sordo di chi non vuole sentire" Till to this point the thread was useful to beginners becouse of a lot of smarty coders explained a point that everyone has heard but that rarely knows at deep... but now Let's ignore him ! He is not a beginner he is a lamer! -- Emiliano Gabrielli dip. di Fisica 2ー Universitdi Roma "Tor Vergata" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Oliver Neukum
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Linus Torvalds
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Oliver Neukum
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Rob Wilkens
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Oliver Neukum
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Rob Wilkens
- Prev by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Consolidate vmlinux.lds.S files
- Previous by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]