On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:18, Aaron Lehmann wrote: > On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 11:12:41PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Yes. Typical error cleanup looks like: > > err_out: > > up(&sem); > > return err; > > > > Releasing a lock in another function is a crime punished by slow death. > > Not to mention that the 'return err;' statement is hard to move to an > inline function meaningfully. Not that hard: You just "return functionname()" where functionname is the name of your inline function that returns the value you want to return. -Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Linus Torvalds
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Rik van Riel
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Rob Wilkens
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Oliver Neukum
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Aaron Lehmann
- Prev by Date: Re: Moderated forum for linux-kernel
- Next by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Previous by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]