Am Sonntag, 12. Januar 2003 22:44 schrieb Rob Wilkens: > On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 16:40, Rik van Riel wrote: > > OK, now imagine the dcache locking changing a little bit. > > You need to update this piece of (duplicated) code in half > > a dozen places in just this function and no doubt in dozens > > of other places all over fs/*.c. > > > > >From a maintenance point of view, a goto to a single block > > > > of error handling code is easier to maintain. > > There's no reason, though, that the error handling/cleanup code can't be > in an entirely separate function, and if speed is needed, there's no > reason it can't be an "inline" function. Or am I oversimplifying things > again? Yes. Typical error cleanup looks like: err_out: up(&sem); return err; Releasing a lock in another function is a crime punished by slow death. (Some might even resort to voodoo to make sure your shadow suffers in the beyond.) It makes code absolutely unreadable. Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Aaron Lehmann
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Linus Torvalds
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Rik van Riel
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Rob Wilkens
- Prev by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Previous by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]