commence Valdis.Kletnieks _at_ vt.edu quotation: > The real problem is that C doesn't have a good multi-level "break" > construct. On the other hand, I don't know of any language that has > a good one - some allow "break 3;" to break 3 levels- but that's > still bad because you get screwed if somebody adds an 'if' > clause.... Perl's facility for labelling blocks and jumping to the beginning or end with 'next' and 'last' may be close to what you want, but I don't know if it's ever been implemented in a language one could sensibly use to write a kernel. -- / | [|] Sean Neakums | Questions are a burden to others; [|] <sneakums _at_ zork.net> | answers a prison for oneself. \ | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Valdis.Kletnieks
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Randy Dunlap
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Linus Torvalds
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Rob Wilkens
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Valdis.Kletnieks
- Prev by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Previous by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]