On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 16:20, Luuk van der Duim wrote: > Aren't those called Willamette based Celerons? The current ones are, but future ones will surely be based on future cores (i.e. I suspect we will see Northwood-based Celerons, soon) and this option will be applicable to those, too. More importantly, the consumer name is just "Celeron" i.e. the box does not mention the core or anything. The best I think we can offer is "P4-based Celeron" which is a nice blanket name. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II supportBill Davidsen
- Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II supportLinus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II supportRobert Love
- Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II supportLuuk van der Duim
- Prev by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by Date: Re: make xconfig broken in bk current
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]