> [Valdis.Kletnieks _at_ vt.edu] > > The real problem is that C doesn't have a good multi-level "break" construct. > On the other hand, I don't know of any language that has a good one - some > allow "break 3;" to break 3 levels- but that's still bad because you get > screwed if somebody adds an 'if' clause.... Not necessarily. A good multilevel break/continue implementation will only work on loop blocks, not conditionals. -- Tomas Szepe <szepe _at_ pinerecords.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Linus Torvalds
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Rob Wilkens
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Valdis.Kletnieks
- Prev by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support
- Previous by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]