On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 14:53, Tomas Szepe wrote: > > [robw _at_ optonline.net] > > > > Am I wrong that the above would do the same thing without generating the > > sphagetti code that a goto would give you. Gotos are BAD, very very > > bad. > > Whom do I pay to have this annoying clueless asshole shot? > OH MY GOD, I really can't take any more. Mail filters are a wonderful thing, use them on me and you want have to have me shot. We'll both be happier in the end. What exactly is it that you can't take? I made a minor suggestion in the above message, very minor, and only a suggestion -- one that was free to be ignorred. There are over 300 messages a day on this list, why do the few ones from _me_ bother you. -Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Terje Eggestad
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Linus Torvalds
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Rob Wilkens
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Rob Wilkens
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Tomas Szepe
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4
- Next by Date: Re: make xconfig broken in bk current
- Previous by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]