On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 19:51, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > What about PCI write posting ? How can we enforce the 400ns delay here ? For i/o space it is ok as in*/out* are synchronous. For mmio right now I don't know. I need to talk to Andre about that for SATA. I guess for the PPC its going to be fun > > 2. The code is racey in some situations with a shared IRQ because we > > may get an IRQ after we set the handler but before we send the command, > > or implemnted the other way the command can complete before we set the > > handler. > > Yup, that's an old problem indeed. Time for it to die.... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Prev by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Previous by thread: Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4
- Next by thread: Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]