On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 21:40, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 19:51, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > What about PCI write posting ? How can we enforce the 400ns delay here ?
>
> For i/o space it is ok as in*/out* are synchronous. For mmio right now I
> don't know. I need to talk to Andre about that for SATA. I guess for the
> PPC its going to be fun
Thinking about it, it might make sense to provide an hwif->IOSYNC iop along
with {IN/OUT}{B,W,L} that would be a no-op by default for that.
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4Alan Cox
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.5.56 panics PostgreSQL
- Next by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Previous by thread: Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4
- Next by thread: Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]