-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The horrific response to the use of "goto" is deprecated in favor of proper use. A function overloaded with gotos probably should be reworked. But there there is no need to outright avoid the use of 'goto'. if() is simply a conditional test with a goto A or goto B logic. There is a reason for the implementation of goto. When it all boils down to it, in assembler it's all a matter of JMP with or without a condition. David Rob Wilkens wrote: >On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 14:41, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > >>On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 02:34:54PM -0500, Rob Wilkens wrote: >> >> >>>Linus, >>> >>>I'm REALLY opposed to the use of the word "goto" in any code where it's >>>not needed. >>> >>> >>Who cares? >> >> >> > >I do. > >-Rob > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+IcjV74cGT/9uvgsRAtPFAKDATzN7dkRyfRk7WXEDGyYe0oGiqACffj+X iXkDBQntdGnHeJFKjfmp0Lg= =l9hb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Rob Wilkens
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Linus Torvalds
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Rob Wilkens
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Christoph Hellwig
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Rob Wilkens
- Prev by Date: Re: Intel And Kenrel Programming (was: Nvidia is a great company)
- Next by Date: Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre3-ac4
- Previous by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]