On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:45:24 GMT, Alan Cox said: > One thing that has been helpful is the microcode update stuff Intel did, we > hit few bugs that up to date microcode kill off http://www.urbanmyth.org/microcode/ says that microcode_ctl 1.06 is the latest, dated all the way back to 11 Jun 2001. Is that in fact the most recent? In this industry, I alway worry when "most recent" is 18 months old. Hopefully it's the most recent because no further errata have been found.;) -- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech
Attachment:
pgp289679.pgp
Description: PGP signature
References:
- Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"Chuck Wolber
- Intel And Kenrel Programming (was: Nvidia is a great company)Rob Wilkens
- Re: Intel And Kenrel Programming (was: Nvidia is a great company)Alan Cox
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] PnP update - drivers
- Next by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Previous by thread: Re: Intel And Kenrel Programming
- Next by thread: Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]