On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 18:55, ghugh Song wrote: > Many people including me are getting unusual Kernel > trouble recently with 2.4.21-pre3-ac*. In my case, with > 2.4.21-pre3-ac2 I got segmentation fault from > a command (tar) where I never suspected. Yet no one seems to know > what part of the the kernel update caused all this > trouble. > > Does anyone have any guess? At the moment I am not sure. Its stable on my boxes using gcc 3.1 and built from make distclean. At least one reporter found a patch and build over an old built tree failed but a clean tree did not. The obvious candidates assuming 2.4.21-pre3 is stable are the mm/shmem.c changes (you can back out just the diff to that file and retest which would be interesting), or the buffer cache changes which I plan to drop out to test soon. Neither of these two changes are due for Marcelo. Are you using highmem (> 900Mb RAM in the box) Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups: References:
- Nervous with 2.4.21-pre3 and -pre3-ac*ghugh Song
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] add explicit Pentium II support
- Next by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Previous by thread: Nervous with 2.4.21-pre3 and -pre3-ac*
- Next by thread: Re: Nervous with 2.4.21-pre3 and -pre3-ac*
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]