On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 09:05:16AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > The only place that looked like it _really_ didn't get the kernel lock was > apparently tty_open(), which is admittedly a fairly important part of it ;) 2.5 does hold the BKL on ->open of charater- (and block-) devices. The real problem is that the big irqlock is gone and mingo just replaced it with local_irq_save & friends, which is not enough. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Linus Torvalds
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Greg KH
- Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?Linus Torvalds
- Prev by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Previous by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by thread: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]