On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 13:15, Hubert Mantel wrote: > > In the opinion of many devlopers, the preferred form of the Linux kernel for > > maintaining it is a set of individual patches against the closest > > 'official' release, and not a tarball containing already-modified code. > > So you are saying that Alan Cox is violating the GPL since he releases his > -ac kernels only as one single monolithic patch against the vanilla tree, > not as individual patches (like Andrea Arcangeli does for example)? > > I think the motivation for this ridiculous thread is very obvious. I think Dave needs to type "man diff" 8) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL?Dave Jones
- Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL?Horst von Brand
- Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL?David Woodhouse
- Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL?Hubert Mantel
- Prev by Date: Re: Intel And Kenrel Programming (was: Nvidia is a great company)
- Next by Date: Re: 2.5.55/.56 instant reboot problem on 486
- Previous by thread: Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL?
- Next by thread: Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]