On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 02:07:13AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > there are a few options that are categorized as simply > > "bool", with no following label -- examples being UMSDOS, > > QUOTACTL, and a couple of others. without a label on that > > line, the option is not displayed for selection anywhere > > on the menu. is this deliberate? > >... > > Yes, this is what was called define_bool in the old kconfig. > > E.g. > > config QUOTACTL > bool > depends on XFS_QUOTA || QUOTA > default y > > says that QUOTACTL is automatically selected if XFS_QUOTA or QUOTA is > selected. This is a config option that is never visible to the user > configuring the kernel. just a picky point -- since "JBD" is one of these bool options with no label, why does it need a help screen as it has in the current Kconfig file? particularly with info about how and why to *select* this module. or is that cruft leftover from before? rday - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Prev by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by Date: Re: 2.5.55: static compilation of mxser.c doesn't work
- Previous by thread: Re: two more oddities with the fs/Kconfig file
- Next by thread: Re: two more oddities with the fs/Kconfig file
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]