On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 11:24:42AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > I see no reason to not believe Linus when he says an interface is > stable. And that's exactly what he said (or wrote in this case). Linus had no problem with changing his opinion after strong words in the past :) But what exactly is the problem with a changing defintion for you. There is neither a stable kernel nor a formal glibc release with this defined out yet. That means the ABI isn't formalized and the number can be allocated where it belongs. Who cares what Linus said in the past as long as Linux development goes to the right direction? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: make AT_SYSINFO platform-independentUlrich Drepper
- Re: make AT_SYSINFO platform-independentChristoph Hellwig
- Re: make AT_SYSINFO platform-independentUlrich Drepper
- Re: make AT_SYSINFO platform-independentChristoph Hellwig
- Re: make AT_SYSINFO platform-independentUlrich Drepper
- Prev by Date: Re: make AT_SYSINFO platform-independent
- Next by Date: Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL?
- Previous by thread: Re: make AT_SYSINFO platform-independent
- Next by thread: Re: make AT_SYSINFO platform-independent
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]