On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 10:52:46AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > I think it should be updated. There is no released glibc or stable kernel > > with that number yet. > > Actually, we've included the support already in some published code. If > you want to complain to somebody about this, do it to the person who is > responsible for distributing this code. His email address is > > torvalds _at_ transmeta.com > > Make sure you react with the same nastiness as if I would have made the > decision, OK? -EWHATSUP Who is we? And why should I care who selected that number. There is no glibc release yet and no stable kernel release yet with that number. Interfaces change during 2.5 (see the sys_security and largepage syscall removal) and that's okay. There was no nastiness involved in my suggestion. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: make AT_SYSINFO platform-independentUlrich Drepper
- Re: make AT_SYSINFO platform-independentLinus Torvalds
- Re: make AT_SYSINFO platform-independentAlan Cox
- Re: make AT_SYSINFO platform-independentUlrich Drepper
- Prev by Date: Re: make AT_SYSINFO platform-independent
- Next by Date: Re: make AT_SYSINFO platform-independent
- Previous by thread: Re: make AT_SYSINFO platform-independent
- Next by thread: Re: make AT_SYSINFO platform-independent
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]