On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 03:28:40PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 12:51:52PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > openssl is only compiled as a module in released kernels, so it is similar to > > the PPP BSD compression module. > > It compiles parts of openssl which explicitly have a license that conflicts > with the GPL when CONFIG_PPP=y. The bsd_comp stuff was only compilable as > module. I guess you meant CONFIG_CIPHER_TWOFISH, not CONFIG_PPP. Yes it can be compiled in, but UnitedLinux does not do so - the kernel rpm compiles it as a module. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL?Christoph Hellwig
- Prev by Date: Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
- Next by Date: Re: [Lse-tech] Minature NUMA scheduler
- Previous by thread: Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL?
- Next by thread: Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]