Re: [PATCH]Re: spin_locks without smp.

[Alan Cox <alan _at_ xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 13:22, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> On 10 Jan 2003 18:18:39 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> >On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 17:19, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> >> 
> >>     disable_irq();
> >>     spin_lock(&np->lock);
> >> 
> >> That's what 8390.c uses, no need for an #ifdef.
> >
> >Does someone have a card they can test that on. If so then I agree
> >entirely it is the best way to go 
> 
> I have an ISA NE2000 available for testing, if someone feeds me patches.
> Only UP hardware, though.

Sorry I wasnt clear enough. The 8390 is done, the one that would need the 
testing is SMP etherexpress.c.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/