From: "Benjamin LaHaise" <bcrl _at_ redhat.com>
>
> Any conclusions are incomplete without mentioning the serious (30%+)
> degredation on UP systems under a good chunk of the benchmarks. Such
> aspects of the patch make it unsuitable as is for both the mainstream
> and vendor kernels.
>
My patch is definitively WIP - right now I again broke the -ENOMEM and
-EFAULT handling.
--
Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Lse-tech] zerocopy pipe, new versionBenjamin LaHaise <bcrl _at_ redhat.com>
- zerocopy pipe, new version"Manfred Spraul" <manfred _at_ colorfullife.com>
- Re: [Lse-tech] zerocopy pipe, new version"Hubertus Franke" <frankeh _at_ watson.ibm.com>
- Re: [Lse-tech] zerocopy pipe, new versionBenjamin LaHaise <bcrl _at_ redhat.com>
- Prev by Date: CML2-2.1.3 is available
- Next by Date: Re: Aunt Tillie builds a kernel (was Re: ISA hardware discovery -- the elegant solution)
- Previous by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] zerocopy pipe, new version
- Next by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] zerocopy pipe, new version
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]