(it turns out that Manfred used 2.5.2-pre11-vanilla for this test.) On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Manfred Spraul wrote: > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND > 1163 root 39 19 396 396 324 R N 99.5 0.1 0:28 eatcpu > 1164 root 39 19 396 396 324 R N 33.1 0.1 0:11 eatcpu > 1165 root 39 0 396 396 324 R 33.1 0.1 0:07 eatcpu > 1166 root 39 -19 396 396 324 R < 31.3 0.1 0:06 eatcpu The load-balancer in 2.5.2-pre11 is known-broken, please try the -H7 patch to get the latest code. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: cross-cpu balancing with the new schedulerManfred Spraul <manfred _at_ colorfullife.com>
- Prev by Date: Re: tmpfs accounting (was: losetuping files in tmpfs fails?)
- Next by Date: Re: Problem with ServerWorks CNB20LE and lost interrupts
- Previous by thread: Re: cross-cpu balancing with the new scheduler
- Next by thread: Re: cross-cpu balancing with the new scheduler
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]