Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable

[Robert Love <rml _at_ tech9.net>]

On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 14:00, Alan Cox wrote:

> I see absolutely _no_ evidence to support this repeated claim. I'm still
> waiting to see any evidence that low latency patches are not sufficient, or
> an explanation of who is going to fix all the drivers you break in subtle
> ways

I'll work on fixing things the patch breaks.  I don't think it will be
that bad.  I've been working on preemption for a long long time, and
before me others have been working for a long long time, and I just
don't see the hordes of broken drivers or the tons of race-conditions
due to per-CPU data.  I have seen some, and I have fixed them.

For a solution to latency concerns, I'd much prefer to lay a framework
down that provides a proper solution and then work on fine tuning the
kernel to get the desired latency out of it.

	Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/