> Right. Here is what I want for 2.5 as a _general_ step towards a better > kernel that will yield better performance: I see absolutely _no_ evidence to support this repeated claim. I'm still waiting to see any evidence that low latency patches are not sufficient, or an explanation of who is going to fix all the drivers you break in subtle ways - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusableRobert Love <rml _at_ tech9.net>
- Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusableRobert Love <rml _at_ tech9.net>
- Prev by Date: Re: [Q] Looking for an emulation for CMOV* instructions.
- Next by Date: Re: Writeout in recent kernels/VMs poor compared to last -ac
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
- Next by thread: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]