On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > The fun below 1mS comes from > > 1. APM bios calls where the bios decides to take >1mS to have > a chat with your batteries > 2. Video cards pulling borderline legal PCI tricks to get > better benchmarketing by stalling the entire bus Don't forget the embedded space, where the hardware vendor can ensure that their hardware is well-behaved. Even on a PC, it is possible for someone who cares about realtime to spec a reasonable system. On good hardware, we can easily do much better than 1ms latency with a preemptible kernel and a spinlock cleanup. I don't think the limitations of some PC hardware should limit our goals for Linux. Nigel Gamble nigel _at_ nrg.org Mountain View, CA, USA. http://www.nrg.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusableAndrew Morton <akpm _at_ zip.com.au>
- Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusableAlan Cox <alan _at_ lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusableAlan Cox <alan _at_ lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -H4 - 2.4.17 problems
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -H4 - 2.4.17 problems
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
- Next by thread: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]