On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: >In article <200201041725.g04HPwSr031984 _at_ svr3.applink.net> you wrote: >> Why go Fibre Channel when Firewire is really starting to catch on? > >Because Firewire is Consumer electronics and nearly dead. Dont now of >Enterpise Solutions with Firewire. Besides there is no switching support for >it. Actually, I suggested the use of 1394 drives instead of the extremely old and crappy DLT tape drive. There was just one problem... Solaris/Sparc doesn't support SBP2. (In fact, it only supports Sun's firewire camera.) --Ricky - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: Two hdds on one channel - why so slow?Timothy Covell <timothy.covell _at_ ashavan.org>
- Prev by Date: Re: Two hdds on one channel - why so slow?
- Next by Date: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
- Previous by thread: Re: Two hdds on one channel - why so slow?
- Next by thread: Re: Two hdds on one channel - why so slow?
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]