On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, george anzinger wrote: > Nathan wrote: > > > > Out of sheer curiosity (and this might be a stupid question), is there > > any effort to make the following lines of development all work together: > > RML's preempt-kernel and lock-break (and netdev, but that doesn't touch > > the other stuff), Rick's rmap VM, and the O(1) scheduler? If so, is it > No, not in concept. Just that they collide in a couple of places and > need a bit of sorting out. Give us a moment. I'm adding low latency reschedule points to page_launder_zone() and refill_inactive_zone() right now ;) regards, Rik -- Shortwave goes a long way: irc.starchat.net #swl http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, 2.4.17-B0, 2.5.2-pre8-B0.george anzinger <george _at_ mvista.com>
- Prev by Date: Re: Missing entries in Configuure.help)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] preempt abstraction
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, 2.4.17-B0, 2.5.2-pre8-B0.
- Next by thread: UNIX sockets stop responding on 2.4.14
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]