> > Andrew Morten`s read-latency.patch is a clear winner for me, too. > > AFAIK Andrew's code simply adds schedule points around the kernel, righ= > t?=20 > > If so, nope, I do not plan to integrate it. Yep. It has the most wonderful effect on system latency without actually breaking any semantics. Pre-empt is a trickier one because it does change actual behaviour a lot more, although it should be preserving locking rules. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusableMarcelo Tosatti <marcelo _at_ conectiva.com.br>
- Prev by Date: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
- Next by Date: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
- Next by thread: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]