Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable



On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Dieter [iso-8859-15] Nⅳzel wrote (passim):

> Is it possible to decide, now what should go into 2.4.18 (maybe -pre3) -aa or
> -rmap?
[...]
> Maybe preemption? It is disengageable so nobody should be harmed but we get
> the chance for wider testing.
>
> Any comments?
preemption?? this is eventually 2.5 stuff, and should not be integrated
into 2.4 stable tree. Of course a backport is possible, when/if it will be
quite well tested and well working on 2.5





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:

Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusableAndrea Arcangeli <andrea _at_ suse.de>

References:

Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusableDieter =?iso-8859-15?q?N=FCtzel?= <Dieter.Nuetzel _at_ hamburg.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [s-h] Re: ALSA patch for 2.5.2pre9 kernel
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] DevFS support for /dev/cpu/X/(cpuid|msr)
Previous by thread: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
Next by thread: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
Indexes:[Main][Thread]