On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Mark Hahn wrote: > > Would it be possible to introduce concept of I/O priority? I.e. I want > > updatedb not to load disk if I need it for something else? > > makes sense to me. actually, VM is another place where priority > could be quite useful - for instance, how hard the VM scavenges > a proc's pages. oops, there I go advocating a tunable... > > VM_SWAP_ME_HARDER anyone? This seems to work very badly, making one process swap more means it pagefaults more and sucks up more IO bandwidth ;) regards, Rik -- Shortwave goes a long way: irc.starchat.net #swl http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: [PATCH][RFT] simple deadline I/O schedulerMark Hahn <hahn _at_ physics.mcmaster.ca>
- Prev by Date: Re: [announce] [patch] ultra-scalable O(1) SMP and UP scheduler
- Next by Date: Re: Hardware Inventory [was: Re: ISA slot detection on PCI systems?]
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH][RFT] simple deadline I/O scheduler
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][RFT] simple deadline I/O scheduler
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]