On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > Or we could just have a really _deep_ hierarchy, and put everything under > > "linux/drivers/sound/..", but I'd rather break cleanly with the old. > > Christoph has an interesting point. Networking is > > net/[protocol]/ > drivers/net/[driver] > > so by that logic we'd have > > sound/soundcore.c > sound/alsa/alsalibcode > sound/oss/osscore > > sound/drivers/cardfoo.c > > which would also be much cleaner since the supporting crap would be seperate > from the card drivers I would certainly not oppose that. Look sane to me, although the question then ends up being about "drivers/sound" or "sound/drivers" (the latter has the advantage that it keeps sound together, the former is more analogous to the "net" situation). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: ALSA patch for 2.5.2pre9 kernelArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme _at_ conectiva.com.br>
- Re: [s-h] Re: ALSA patch for 2.5.2pre9 kernelAbramo Bagnara <abramo _at_ alsa-project.org>
- Re: ALSA patch for 2.5.2pre9 kernelMiles Lane <miles _at_ megapathdsl.net>
- Re: ALSA patch for 2.5.2pre9 kernelAlan Cox <alan _at_ lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Prev by Date: Re: Hardware Inventory [was: Re: ISA slot detection on PCI systems?]
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] 2.5.2 scheduler code for 2.4.18-pre1 ( was 2.5.2-preperformance degradation on an old 486 )
- Previous by thread: Re: ALSA patch for 2.5.2pre9 kernel
- Next by thread: Re: ALSA patch for 2.5.2pre9 kernel
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]