Re: 2.5.2-pre performance degradation on an old 486

[Mikael Pettersson <mikpe _at_ csd.uu.se>]

On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:43:04 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds wrote:
>Hey, that would do it. It looks like the idle task ends up being a
>_normal_ process (just nice'd down), so it will get real CPU time instead
>of only getting scheduled when nothing else is runnable.
>
>Davide, I think the bounce-buffer is a red herring, it's simply that we're
>wasting time in idle..

This does seem to be the case. As a quick hack I added

	if (p == &init_task) return -50;

at the start of kernel/sched.c:goodness() [to approximate the old
scheduler's behaviour], and this immediately restored performance
on my 486 to the old scheduler's levels.

/Mikael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/