Em Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 03:12:06AM +0100, Daniel Phillips escreveu:
> On January 7, 2002 02:27 am, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > When I did similar work for the network protocols, cleaning up
> > include/net/fs.h DaveM asked for benchmarks to see if the new approach,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
include/net/sock.h
ouch, too much cleanups and lack of sleep(tm) 8)
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
References:
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Clean up fs.h union for ext2Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 _at_ cam.ac.uk>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Clean up fs.h union for ext2Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 _at_ cam.ac.uk>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Clean up fs.h union for ext2Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme _at_ conectiva.com.br>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Clean up fs.h union for ext2Daniel Phillips <phillips _at_ bonn-fries.net>
- Prev by Date: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] 2.5.2 scheduler code for 2.4.18-pre1 ( was 2.5.2-preperformance degradation on an old 486 )
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Clean up fs.h union for ext2
- Next by thread: [ingo scheduler patch] sorry --> 2.4.17-B4 works with no modules kernel....
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]