On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > > I am pretty impressed by Martins test case where merely all VM patches > > fail with the exception of his own :-) > > No big wonder if both -aa and -rmap only get tested without swap ;) To be clear ... -aa and -rmap should of course also work nicely without swap, no excuses for the bad behaviour shown in Martin's test, but at the moment they simply don't seem tuned for it. regards, Rik -- Shortwave goes a long way: irc.starchat.net #swl http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusableStephan von Krawczynski <skraw _at_ ithnet.com>
- Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusableRik van Riel <riel _at_ conectiva.com.br>
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Clean up fs.h union for ext2
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Clean up fs.h union for ext2
- Previous by thread: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
- Next by thread: Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
- Indexes:[Main][Thread]