Re: O(1) scheduler, 2.5.2-pre9-B1 results

On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Anton Blanchard wrote:

> communication latencies: Pipe, AF, TCP slightly up (BAD)

this is mainly because i have not made the O(1) scheduler fully aware of
synchronous wakeups yet. I'm working on this part now that the bugs are
fixed. If you remove synchronous wakeups from the stock kernel then you'll
see processes distributed to different CPUs but bad lmbench latencies.

> So far things look good. Next up I'll look at how it scales on the 12
> way.

thanks!

	Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo _at_ vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:

O(1) scheduler, 2.5.2-pre9-B1 resultsAnton Blanchard <anton _at_ samba.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH]: 2.5.1pre9 change several if (x) BUG to BUG_ON(x)
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
Previous by thread: O(1) scheduler, 2.5.2-pre9-B1 results
Next by thread: Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, 2.4.17-B0, 2.5.2-pre8-B0.
Indexes:[Main][Thread]